Poverty In California and the Elite Fraudulent
facts: 2006 A.D. to current 2015, all SoCal jobs have gone to illegals, not legally seen as illegal in the State of California. Then we learned in 2015 38% of all jobs in the state of New York, U.S.A. are held by illegal aliens ( Fed. law says they are illegal, undocumented). Why? Corruption by both parties for decades and decades. They , both sides, give foreigners preferences to hopefully get their vote.
Facts: Jerry Brown signed off on uber secret Operation 40, no incarceration of illegal allowed, unless a repeated violent offender ( circa 1980s - current).
Census 2010 ( projected 2014 A.D. Latin/Brown SoCal population at 73%, Latin births out perform black or whites, including white Asians and white Southern Asians.
Facts: Latins Catholic Population at 1%, Latin Moslem Population at 50% and Latin Secular at 49%.
Liberals show tremendous compassion in pushing for generous government spending to help the neediest people at home and abroad. Yet when it comes to individual contributions to charitable causes, liberals are cheapskates.
Arthur Brooks, the author of a book on donors to charity, “Who Really Cares,” cites data that households headed by conservatives give 30 percent more to charity than households headed by liberals. A study by Google found an even greater disproportion: average annual contributions reported by conservatives were almost double those of liberals.
Other research has reached similar conclusions. The “generosity index” from the Catalogue for Philanthropy typically finds that red states are the most likely to give to nonprofits, while Northeastern states are least likely to do so.
The upshot is that Democrats, who speak passionately about the hungry and homeless, personally fork over less money to charity than Republicans — the ones who try to cut health insurance for children.
Satan is a
liar: So how to find Satanists? It is very
This is the U.S.A.
Government Definition of what is a Democrat in contrast to a Republican:
Democrats are generally more liberal. They believe in a larger federal
government, and often implement tax plans to try to help the less
privileged. So let us put this to the test. ( this comparison is absent
on Social Issues, it looks at ideologies of the State and foreign
American Revolution Founding
foreign stance: Isolationist
Time-Frame 1780s -1930s
(except for Democratic Party
founder Jefferson’s north African war).
American Changed Principle:
dominate & conquest, suppression, control, take without
Time-Frame 1930s - Current
F.D.R. Liberalism & Capitalism, one
world Satanic Government of the 1%ers as a vision. Franklin
Delano Roosevelt’s family ran all ariel and control of all Opium
distribution in China, how he rose to prominence and why he
micromanaged the eastern theater and stayed out of the European
theater during WWII. F.D.R. started World War II in China in
1937 A.D, sending troops there to protect his family’s business.
He also sent troops to protect Winston Churchill’ Indian
suppression government, that Gandhi helped expel. These are not
Democrats we aspire to be, the only supporters are of Satan’s
Army. On the U.S.A. currency, F.D.R. put Pagan symbols and
called it 'In God We Trust,' but this was not the God of the
Hebrews, Moslems or Christians -- but a pagan god, we know as
or Conservatives in the Office of the U.S.A. President:
Kennedy ( ran on Democrat) was the most republican and
Jimmy Carter ( ran on Democrat) was the next most conservative or Republican
in this time frame.
(ran on Republican) but was not as conservative as Kennedy or
The rest of the
presidents were left-wingers or extreme left wingers – including
both Bushes – and it does not matter what they said, it is how
The Latin Phrase, A new order of the ages intends
that Republicanism has ended and a new form of Democracy
arose – which is evident in F.D.R.’s plan to place over 150
military bases around the world for quick suppression of the
non-industrial countries and make their people suffer in
Plato ( Hellenist
philosopher) argued real democracy is a small place where all of the
local take turns running the government, in five year shifts. Today, in
my state, Nancy Pelosi ( made over $50,000,000 on insider trading, legal
only in the district of Columbia, not a state in the U.S.A.), Diane
Feinstein, Jiang Zemin came to the bay area and gave her husband a
$10,000,000 gig for transferring vital duel-nuclear weapon tech to
China, per annum, met in the 1980s, when Zemin was Shanghais governor;
and Barbara Boxer, who admits she does not work, just signs anything the
Democratic Party approves – all have been in power for almost all of my
life – over 30 + years. This is not Greek Democracy; at all it is some
form of trickery. When all three ladies took office in California, the
education system, even the middle to elementary schools were ranked #1
in all of the world. Today, not speaking of the world, but in the U.S.A.
California ranks #47 and so we see that damage of old bully gals just
using government to enrich their families and steal form the people.
California State of Union Address: 24.2% of Californians live in
Governor J. Brown claims a success, surpluses, economy already
1:50 p.m. 22 Jan. 2014. Studio City.
I live in California, the only people
working are illegal immigrants and rich foreigners that come here to
play with their family's capitalistic wealth. Also, then there are
Hollywood, 1%ers, with their 8 bathroom mansions and 3 homes accross the
world, crying they are financially suppressed by right wingers ?,
totally insane and out of touch with reality.
Poverty rates continue to soar in the
aftermath of the Great Recession.
After declining to a 20-year low of 12% in 2006, the official poverty
rate in California spiked upward in the wake of the Great Recession: as
of 2011, it was 16.9%. This amounts to more than six million
Californians living in households with incomes below the federal poverty
level (about $23,000 for a family of four). The Census "Supplemental
Poverty Measure,” which incorporates California’s high cost of living
and the effect of safety net programs such as food stamps, suggests that
California’s poverty rate is even higher—23.5% during 2009-2011.
"Liberals have to keep up the facade that they are for the "working man". Dems today are corporate dems, they're the same as establishment GOP. They're both opportunists who have no loyalty except to those who keep paying them the big checks." -- comment chezC3, from CBSnews comment section, The Era of the Limousine Liberal is Back, 21 June 2014.
DEMOCRATIC WAR on POVERTY GRADE F-, a total failure in civics.
the socialist Europe, from restrictive 10% of the population to less
restrictive of 20-23% of the total state populations receive subsidies
for housings. In the U.S.A. section 8 ( given to foreigners for their
votes, a political ploy of the left, including republicans that vote for
this stuff) is about 03% ( only three percent). This is an ultimate
failure and has nothing to do with Republicans.
DAVOS Economic Forum 2014, Released 22
Jan. 68 Democrats hold nearly 1/2 of the World's wealth and will not
share. Los Angeles Times.
George Clooney, Leonardo DiCaprio, Julia Roberts, and most other
Hollywood heavy weights proclaim form the rooftops (bully pulpit of
celebrity status) that poverty is 100% because of Republicans --
according to Satan's Army want to kill women, children, eat babies,
warmonger, and punish the poor. Hollwoodites harp on all the world to
pay more in taxes, while they take Hollywood production to Canada and
overseas to escape Los Angeles’ film-zoning fees which are a needed tax
for the benefit of the city that hosts its headquarters. Why do they do
this? Hollywood does this so they can pay their actors ( female and
male) higher salaries, because greed is a good thing in Hollywood, and
hurting the poor is exciting. Hollywood hurts the poor by relocating
production when not scenerically necessary in all Hollywood productions.
For the imbecile Dumbocraps, The Koch Brothers
are not Republicans, they are Independent or libertarians which are
left-wingers –otherwise, even the Waltons ( Wal-Mart) are even
contributors to both parties – the rest are vamping leftists like
Bill Gates ( Let us have N.S.A. snooping and I want to kill all of
you but me and my buddies), George Soros, who wreaked the U.K.
currency by capitalistic greed; Oprah Winfrey, the richest female in
America and tops around the world who built an African female orphan
house and does nothing to stop the adult women from raping these
innocent children; and Oprah has been rumored to be at least
bi-sexual which is disturbing that these female orphans that are
complaining of rape by other females are not fixed by one of the
richest persons in the world.
Michael Bloomberg ( former doctorial mayor of
New York, who flies to a private island of his own on weekends) is
not a republican, he used to be but changed party affiliations a
long time ago.
85 richest people own as much as bottom half of population ... -- Los Angeles Times 20 Jan. 2014.
When you are filthy rich, John Kerry is among
the wealthiest Senators in all of American history or in fact any
government’s history, so we know he does not care about the poor,
one works for more wealth. John Kerry is so rich he has one of those
luxury boats, costing over $1 million dollars. To escape mooring
taxes, he moved his boat to another state to escape paying about
$150,000 mooring tax, when his combined family has near one billion
dollars. The world cannot tolerate haters of humans.
Harry Truman on F.D.R.’s orders used the
uranium bomb and a plutonium bomb on innocent people because
Truman’s orders was to have Japan’s ‘unconditional surrender;’
Japan’s army was already defeated more than one month before
dropping of these mega deathbombs. So why should the U.S.A. then
restrict any other nation? It makes no sense. The only reason the
atomic bomb was built and then used was Albert Einstein’s persistent
groveling to F.D.R., seen in film and historical letters. Here are
the facts. Japan’s five big industrial cities were burnt to the
ground by illegal incendiary bombing, outlawed after WWI. So that
was illegal. Japan’s last navy ship when on a suicide mission and
lost. All of the Japan’s air force was decimated, so no more
kamikaze missions, and Russians had invaded Manchuria to annex it
illegally --- by illegal agreement between Stalin and Roosevelt, at
Cairo, witnessed by Jiang Kai-shek, KMT leader; so Japan was
not going to mount any fight. There was no need to invade, Japan
posed absolutely no threat. So why did Harry Truman decide to test
these WMD bombs on innocent Japanese? It is because America is not
responsible for having nuclear weapons and also not telling other
nations that have never used them they cannot have them.
California Poverty: 1990s—in 1993 the poverty rate reached 18.1%.
did Hollywood do and what did Sports teams do? They got multi million
dollar raises. In Los Angeles, I see $100,000,000 illiterate blacks
driving the most luxurious vehicles, must be driving to their 12
bathroom mansion, and they are voting and have voted Democrat and spend
numerous amounts of their life – but the point is that they blame
poverty on Republicans or some other invisible entity. The same goes to
Actors. Then there are good looking humans, terrible actors, like
Leonardo DiCaprio who made ( or continues to make) $20,000,000 a film
and because of his fame and fortune stood with Al Gore on a platform (
DiCaprio’s words, ‘ to look hardcore,’ as the philanthropist and WMD
defrayer as V.P. told the world to empty their banks accounts to his
foundations because all the ice on the poles would melt by 2010 A.D –
with 100% no proof of any claim as a scientist. There has not been any
science in the last 60 years or so, it has been guess-work and political
propaganda.) the Rich and stupid continue day-in-and-day-out to preach
and discipline us by their avarice. DiCaprio does not need $20,000,000
a film; does his acting have anything to do with this? Titanic was a hit
because of James Cameron’s gargantuan style of set decorations, not
because of DiCaprio’s acting. So over time, some say Leonardo with
real-estate holdings is worth $250,000,000. That places him well within
the 1%ers in this world. Does he deserve that money when 24.2%
(California Social Security figures) of all Californians live on or
under the poverty level? I do not think so, and the proof is his
statements on his newest film, “The Wolves of Wall Street.” It
glamorizes corruption ( do we get stories of the people that Wall Street
crooks hurt in the film? NO!) and celebrates by visual desires of what
most people want, sex, drugs ( or expensive food) and money with power.
Jordan Belfort, the true-life stockbroker portrayed by DiCaprio I saw on
CNN last night, celebrating freedom and family, unconcerned with the
people he destroyed. He did his legal obligation of jail time, but
appeared unremorseful. DiCaprio ( during interviews for the film,
junkets) that his character loses in the end, but DiCaprio is again
lying. The film shows a playboy on Wall Street living what many males
would desire and only in the end does Belfort get caught to which
DiCaprio claims, see there was a bad ending to him – which is not true.
Many poor males would give one year of their lives ( and die afterwards)
to live on year in Belfort’s shoes. The problem is much wider than
DiCapiro, it is a narcissistic Hollywood, where DiCaprio played the role
of what Hollywood does, debauchery, lavishness, hurting others and
laughing as a way for fun, and ‘feeling’ special and privileged. Does
DiCapiro stand in line at all? In the Founder’s papers of America, they
forbit ‘titles’ of any kind, not liked to civics. So ‘celebrity and/or
star(s) would be outlawed because it makes idol worship where
concentration is on worshiping DiCaprio why the greater or larger
population lives in filth and poverty. When speaking on disease and
addictions, celebrities have serious afflictions to attention to the
point of destroying those around them so they can get that’ high’ again,
because it became an addiction like their first hit.
Leonardo will tell anyone that poverty is because of the right-wing, and
never the democrats – which is a 100% lie. The democrats have safety
nets so baseless and poverty stricken that they only support the poor up
to the point where mass riots will not take place. The Democrats are not
interested in making the poor respectable and with a function and
healthy lifestyle. The War on Poverty, conducted by MEAMIC and
assassinator of John F. Kennedy ( so he could take the U.S. seat of
Presidency) is an abject failure on all accents. Poverty has
increased, every state, since the 1960s.
leftist Hollywood anti Gun issue is 100% simple. They want all guns out
of society so the people do not invade their castles and rob their
horded treasures of avarice and capitalism. The proof is overweight and
uncontrolled failure Rosie O’Donnell, who had armed guards but tells
U.S. manufactures to get guns out of the commoners. She does not want
anyone to rob her refrigerator that fat-ass needs to be eliminated,
there is no room for suppressing the poor to pad your stomach full of
crème of avarice.
describe DiCaprio? He has alpha scorpius signatures to his solar system
bodies all over his chart. Ancient call this star the bully star, and
that is what DiCaprio displays in his acting roles and his personal
life. This signature is about wealth, money, power and capitalism ( e.g.
taking advantage over others). The U.S.A. Sibely Chart, the official or
first U.S. chart has alpha scorpius on its actionary angle – the most
powerful, so MEAMIC after World War II carved up the World, placing over
150 U.S. military suppression bases to control and exploit the poor, so
DiCaprio could make his gazzillions.
Hollywood, ethics and morality are shadows and lies, made to trick the
people that these filthy richies care about you or the planet. When
Steven Spielberg made his hit piece on Abraham Lincoln, the gist of the
money was the Lion of the Senate only made emancipation happen because
he was having fantastic sex with a black slave, and wanted to free her
to get married or just provide a favor not because human slavery is
wrong. Spielberg is of the wealthiest of Hollywoodites, around $3
Billion, at least publically revealed. He makes decent fantasy children
escapism films, and should leave them at that and not tackle historical
pieces where he should have gone to Harvard or Yale (two good American
history departments, do not go to U.C. Berkeley it remains of the worst
in the world, they specialize in all lands east of the east Coast of
America) first before tackling these films. Spielberg’s film, Lincoln should have been titled, The Lion of the Senate. That was the
hook of the film, not Lincoln’s struggles. Slavery was a huge issue and
not a sexual one with one man and Steven Spielberg’s version is a hater
film and he gives Hebrews a bad name and distorts history.
Socrates was put to death on charges of corrupting the minds of the
youth, he was most properly pointing out the civil officials of Athens’
Socrates was put to death on charges of corrupting the minds of the
youth, he was most properly pointing out the civil officials of Athens’
corruption instead. It is too difficult to believe Spielberg did not
know what lies he was doing, so he must be corrupting the minds of the
youth, as people who see Hollywood films are told they are 100% true.
Blacks or anyone did not flood the Senate to watch the proceedings, so
Spielberg lied; Southerner leaders in droves did not come to the Capital
or a neutral meeting place to vote in presence, they voted in absence.
And one of the main significance of abolition of Slavery was the
creation of the Minimum wage, not blacks have fantastic sex stamina?
Spielberg’s best movies were the Goonies and E.T. and these were kid
fantasies and very well and entertaining movies – he should stick to
these types of film. Please do not make a mockery of blacks and claim
they were emancipated because of one white dude fell in love with his
black slave. Yes, DiCaprio made Jordan Belfort claim today , he is a
Hollywood Hot-Shot. He feels delighted. Hollywoodites loves to champion
the evil, the suppressors, the criminals, because that is what they are
in reality. Like attracts like, the first principle in all of physics.
Leonardo DiCaprio received an Oscar nomination for his role as the Wall
Street high-roller, and not because it has morals or lessons --
Belfort on CNN has no shame, he was gleeming with happiness that
DiCaprio allowed for his own celebrity, because in the film, he is
protrayed as living a life many males dream of and he is out free and
now a Hollywood Hot-Shot. Let us shit on everyone, make a movie
celebrating it, and make tons of money form it, and win awards from it,
and then claim all the problems in the world are because of some poor
Republican farmer in the mid-west.
California typically has a higher poverty rate than the rest of the
For most of the past two decades, California’s poverty rate has exceeded
that of the nation’s. By 2006, the two rates had nearly converged, with
California’s rate declining and the rate in the rest of the U.S. rising.
But during the Great Recession, the state’s poverty rate grew faster,
and now California’s rate is higher (16.9%) than the rate in the rest of
the country (14.7%). California also has a
massive illegal alien population which much of it works for the State of
California, they do not follow laws here not matter what is said, they
ignore everything. Even if you come from Mexico and are not American or
have a green card, you can get SSI or $950.oo a month, with signs at the
local Social Security Offices -- because Latino voters vote always
toward the Democrats 'already in power for most of their lives'. People
do not belive it because they refuse too.
varies considerably across California’s
In 2011, the lowest poverty rate in
California was in San Mateo County
(7.2%) and the highest was in Merced
County (30.0%). Many Bay Area counties
in addition to San Mateo (Marin, Santa
Clara, Sonoma, Contra Costa, and
Alameda) had poverty rates below 13%,
placing them in the bottom quarter of
all counties. At the other end of the
spectrum, several Central Valley
counties in addition to Merced (Tulare,
Kern, Fresno, Stanislaus, Madera, Yolo,
and Butte) were in the top quarter, with
poverty rates in excess of 20%. Nearly
30% of all poor people in California
lived in Los Angeles County (1.8 million
people) in 2011—by far the largest
number in the state.
Sources: American Community Survey (2011) for
demographic and geographic breakdown,
Current Population Survey Annual Social and
Economic Supplement (1970-2011) for trends,
both from the U.S. Census Bureau. Census
Bureau Supplemental Poverty Measure
resources ("The Research Supplemental
Poverty Measure: 2011” Kathleen Short,
November 2012, U.S. Census Bureau Current
African Americans have higher poverty rates than other groups in white
dominated nor cal -- but not southern California.
Not In Los
Angeles -- how about deleting Hollywoodites that come from other states
and skew the real Los Angelinos?
Latinos (23.6%) [ 71% of Los Angeles Population, and hold most of the
city jobs] and African Americans (24.2%) [12% national population, and
this small fraction of the whole is not accounted for, I see so many
blacks in lux cars and lux houses and apts? ] have much higher poverty
rates than Asians (12.6%) and whites (9.8%) in California. The statewide
poverty rate among Latinos living in families with a foreign-born head
of household is 26.9%; for the same group outside of California, it is
significantly higher (30.1%). Poverty rates increased for all racial and
ethnic groups in California between 2010 and 2011 [under Obama's
directive, he just prints money from nothing to give to Wall Street
which has been evident since he took office, his only purpose to be
alive is to make the rich more rich].
Latinos control Los Angeles, they make up 71% of the total population,
and control the infrastructure jobs. I have not met one Hispanic nor
Native American who tells me they have a desire of Democracy. For the
Hispanics or Latinos that identify with Hispanic culture have never run
a Democracy in over 5,000 years of history – so what do you think will
happen in 2050 when they take over the majority of the legislators in
most U.S. states? The Democracy Party has championed and used the
non-democratic migrants as tools to battle Democrats ( most of them are
in the Republican Party, not the rich ones that have been in power, for
example. Both Bushes are extreme leftists no matter what they say or
what party they are affiliated too. Jimmy Carter was more right-wing
than Ronald Reagan. Bill Clinton and George H. W. Bush are son
(Clinton) and father ( Bush). The two have formed a loving relationship
of late. This because their ideals are one and the same. It is all about
power and fleecing the innocents of their worth. Bill Clinton’s total
four decades in public offices should have netted him some $1.5 million
dollars, but in his bank account he has $150,000,000 and no one knows
exactly where all that cash came from. He is one of the few that have a
one –million dollar a day credit card limit.